Democratic state
and society is precondition for total development of a country. Democracy is the
thumb for sustainable development. Democracy is the motto for humanism and
balanced society. Any decision would be taken showing honor to the opinion of
maximum people of any society or state or organization which is called
democracy.
Democracy only can
ensure peace, progress, justice and achievement. It can also ensure right for
all strata of human being.
So it is necessary
to ensure that the peoples verdict, support, opinion and expectation is presented
correctly and impartially. What peoples are expecting through their opinion
should be depicted correctly. There should not be any way or process that
peoples support and verdict is showed after changes fully or partially. This is
a great challenge for the developing and under developed countries to ensure
that peoples verdict is representing any decision.
Misled democracy:
In most of the cases
during formation of government which we see that peoples verdict is changed in the
under-developed and developing countries through unauthorized handling of any powerful
organ like Election Commission (EC) or Army of the concerned country with close
instigate of nearest upper trended country which lead to even civil war of many
countries.
This kind of broken
democracy leads a country to instability in their social structure, financial
bodies, political organizations, constitutional institutions and in every cases
of life.
This kind of
dictatorship can do all evil in the name of raped democracy. It allows any injustice
in the name of justice. Liking and disliking of ruling hoodlums command all
sectors even the issues related to human rights like government appointment,
jobs, services, violation of constitutional rights like deprivation in respect
of cast, colour, religion, birth, everything what they wish and also judgment in court as per wish of the
rulers.
So dictator in the
way of misled democracy that means when democracy is snatched or hijacked through
different powers in evil ways like changing of peoples right, verdict and
opinion over the night.
It is very
dangerous because this kind of government emblems themselves as democratic one
and try to find support of the developed and democracy loving countries but
actually they are not elected one. So they get most of the support of many
countries as democratically elected government though they are absolutely have
come in power through conspiracy of changing peoples’ verdict.
This kind of
political parties or government formed by them encourages them to do more oppression
on the general people of the country. They can not hold peoples expectation, values,
wishes and mind.
Middle East Incidents:
Peoples and their
movements specially memorizes us the state of democracy in the most oil
enriched countries of the world like Egypt, Yemen, Syria and Libya.
A number of
republics embracing Arab Socialism, such as Syria and Egypt, regularly hold
elections, but critics assert that these are single-party states or unfair
dominant-party systems and not full multi-party systems. Multi party system could
not evolve in these countries due to oppression from ruling party which is
mainly family based. They are the controller of all civil and military power.
Most importantly
they do not allow citizens to choose between different candidates for
presidency election. The constitution of modern Egypt has always given the
president a virtual monopoly over the decision making process, devoting 30
articles (15 percent of the whole constitution) to presidential prerogatives.
According to the
constitution, the Egyptian president's powers are equivalent to those of the
prime minister in parliamentary systems and to the president of the French
Fifth Republic.
Yemen, Lebanon and
the Palestinian Authority, while also partly accepting this ideology, are
generally considered more democratic than other states that do so, but the
power of institutions in the latter two are limited by the domination of Syria
and Israel, respectively.
Absolute monarchy
is more common in the Middle East than elsewhere, and even a number of kingdoms
with parliaments have been claimed to fall broadly under this category. Saudi
Arabia and most other kingdoms on the Arabian Peninsula are usually considered
absolute monarchies. When one looks at the Arab states of the Middle East in
comparison to countries around the world, the endurance of their authoritarian
systems seems extraordinary.
Although personalistic
regimes have fallen throughout sub-Saharan Africa, for example, the Middle East
displays a wealth of similarly corrupt dictatorships that remain in power.
Libyan leader
Moammar Gadhafi compelled to leave power after taking thousands of lives. It
was not absolutely unessential for him because he could leave power even when
the movement for democracy was mounted and people of his country were not
accepting him as ruler.
The parallel condition
we see in many countries of Africa. The democracy is marginally practiced there
as like of eyewash.
Many Asian
countries are also prey of this showing democracy like Bangladesh when they
were affected by Army backed interim government on January 11, 2007 for 90 days
firstly then it was prolonged for two years ending on January 06, 2009. During
their regime, an election was held in the country on December 29, 2008. In the result
of the election they published a one sided result to save themselves from any punishment
through winning Awami League (AL) who backed that interim government when they
came in power in 2007.
The same kind of scenario
we see in Pakistan at different times. Myanmar is the most hard here to give
state power to its people.
Transparency in right
depiction of peoples’ verdict can ensure rule of law only. Millions of peoples
wait for an election to lead a country as per the expectation of the people.
But peoples’ expectation and target go in despair when their verdict is
snatched, support is changed in evil way, repression escalated to suppress them,
constitutional rights are denied to grasp in power.
Comments
Post a Comment